Descargar excel de la calculadora de Joaquín Primo: Pulse aquí

A vs C B vs C
Estimador (RR) directo:
Varianza ln estimador directo:
IC 95% z p
Estimador (RR) ajustado indirecto A vs B: 0.57 0.37 0.90 -2.43 0.01496

- Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Griffith LE, Walter SD. The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:683-91.

A vs C B vs C
Estimador (RR) directo:
Límite inferior IC 95% estimador directo:
Límite superior IC 95% estimador directo:
IC 95% z p
Estimador (RR) ajustado indirecto A vs B: 0.57 0.37 0.89 -2.46 0.01381

- Altman DG, Bland JM. Interaction revisited: the difference between two stimates. BMJ 2003;326:219.

Directo A vs B Indirecto A vs B
Estimador (RR) directo:
Límite inferior IC 95% estimador:
Límite superior IC 95% estimador:
IC 95% z p
Estimador (RR) combinado: 0.76 0.65 0.89 -3.43 0.00060
IC 95% z p
Discrepancia entre estimador directo e indirecto: 1.39 0.86 2.23 1.35 0.17859
(Razón de riesgos relativos)

- Glenny AM, Altman DG, Song F, Sakarovitch C, Deeks JJ, D'Amico R, Bradburn M, Eastwood AJ; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group. Indirect comparisons of competing interventions. Health Technol Assess 2005;9:1-134.
- Song F, Altman DG, Glenny AM, Deeks JJ. Validity of indirect comparison for estimating efficacy of competing interventions: empirical evidence from published meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;326:472-476.